Subject: Re: [RML] new article
From: Xavier David (xavdav at optusnet.com.au)
Date: Wed Dec 01 2004 - 13:37:37 CST
Then if it is true, they are even more useless than I though. They always had extrem positions on a lot of matters that make even some anglers jump to the roof,. In NSW it is even illegal to translocate a fish to a different river system, even if the specie occurs in this system, to avoid altering the genetic particularities of the specie living in each system.
----- Original Message -----
From: finsen at optusnet.com.au
To: r_m_l at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [RML] new article
But they *do* translocate species which don't naturally occur in a waterbody. Which potentially as bad as releasing exotics.
caio
Graeme
----- Original Message -----
From: Xavier David
To: r_m_l at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [RML] new article
As far as we know Sunfish as nothing to do with the translocation of exotic species. The translocation is rather the result of irresponsible hobbyists dumping unwanted fish in local waterways. Sunfish is an angler lobbying group and,until now would not promote the translocation of native or exotic species in or within Australia,
The use of tilapia as live bait by some unscrupulous anglers might be also a possible scenario responsible for the introduction of tilapia in some waterways, but Sunfish is not approving those practices, despite its extreme positions "in the name of recreational anglers rights at any price".
Note: I do not belong to Sunfish, I am an angler and an aquarium hobbyist.
----- Original Message -----
From: finsen at optusnet.com.au
To: r_m_l at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [RML] new article
Aren't Sunfish responsible for translocations of non-endemic species as well?
caio
Graeme
> Peter Unmack <peter.lists at> wrote:
>
>
> G'day folks
>
> I thought some of you might be interested to read this.
>
> http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2004/s1252349.htm
>
> Nothing very new unfortunately....
>
> Cheers
> Peter Unmack
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.4 - Release Date: 30/11/2004
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.4 - Release Date: 30/11/2004
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.4 - Release Date: 30/11/2004
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.4 - Release Date: 30/11/2004
: Tue Jan 04 2005 - 17:49:01 CST