RE: AW: [RML] Reading stuff - and food for thought

Julie Zeppieri (bowluvr at hotmail.com)
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:54:13 -0800

Yeah, Harro, you are right. He is also doing a fair job in decimating social
programs hereabouts.

FWIW, I appologise to all you out there in the rest of the world for the
stupidity of my fellow countrymen in re-electing that jerk. :-( I sure
didn't vote for him! Not my country's proudest or smartest moment.

Julie <><

>From: harro.hieronimus at t-online.de
>Reply-To: r_m_l at yahoogroups.com
>To: <r_m_l at yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: AW: [RML] Reading stuff - and food for thought
>Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 02:34:04 +0100
>
>Haven’t you read the latest news? George Bush will blow up defense funds
>– and he will save the money in environment and social programs. Call me
>pessimistic but as long as the energy and oil industry rules the US (and
>how should that change the next decades?) nothing will change. Even the
>Chinese seem to have more sense for the problems than GWB.
>
>
>
>Regards Harro
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Andrew Boyd [andrew_db at bigpond.com]
>Gesendet: Montag, 7. Februar 2005 19:24
>An: r_m_l at yahoogroups.com
>Betreff: Re: [RML] Reading stuff - and food for thought
>
>
>
>Hi Christophe,
>
>interesting article. The sad part is that there are a lot of countries
>that don't recognise climate change as a problem at the highest level.
>
>I consider it to be on-topic.
>
>Best regards, Andrew
>
>Christophe Mailliet wrote:
>
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >Just found this very disturbing article on the website of The
>Independent, one of the UK's biggest newspapers, concerning the current
>state of affairs with our planet's climate and what it entails for its
>ecosystems (and mankind):
>http://news.independent.co.uk/world/environment/story.jsp?story=608209
> >
> >I am usually not sending this type of information around randomly, as I
>think everyone should be old enough to educate themselves on this type
>of issues.
> >
> >But I am just thinking that if things happen like described in this
>article (and it looks like it's the case), then there will not be many
>fish (or other animals, for that matter) to keep in aquaria in a couple
>of year's time..
> >
> >Apologies if you feel this is off-topic - I really think it is not that
>much.
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Christophe
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>_________________________________________
>Andrew Boyd
>Business Development Manager
>Daily Basis P/L
>Phone 02 6282 9797 or 02 4885 1357
>Mobile 0412 641 074
>Email andrew at dailybasis.com.au
>or andrew_db at bigpond.com
>_________________________________________
>
>
>
>