In a message dated 4/4/2001 1:34:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
bowluvr at email.msn.com writes:
> > From what I understand the M. pieruccia are somewhat rare/unusual? I
> noticed there >is nothing on Adrian Tappan's site about them.
>
i'm surprised none of the big-mouthed experts haven't said anything yet :-)
it's usually a very chatty list.
i know nothing about this fish, except that it is one of the newer rainbows
in the hobby, they are from new guinea, not australia, and are named after
heiko bleher's companion, pieruccia. i think the correct name for the fish
is M. pierucciae. yes, they are very rare in the u.s., along with M. kamaka
and honest politicians...
i'm sure if anything i said above is incorrect, the experts will interject
and slap me... figuratively speaking of course. :-)
tsuh yang chen, nyc, USA
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/orchidspecies
--part1_35.131df692.27fd7bde_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 4/4/2001 1:34:39 PM Eastern
Daylight Time,
bowluvr at email.msn.com writes:
> From what I understand the M.
pieruccia are somewhat rare/unusual? I
noticed there >is nothing on Adrian Tappan's site about them.
i'm surprised none of the big-mouthed experts haven't said anything yet :-)
it's usually a very chatty list.
i know nothing about this fish, except that it is one of the newer rainbows
in the hobby, they are from new guinea, not australia, and are named after
heiko bleher's companion, pieruccia. i think the correct name for the
fish
is M. pierucciae. yes, they are very rare in the u.s., along with M.
kamaka
and honest politicians...
i'm sure if anything i said above is incorrect, the experts will interject
and slap me... figuratively speaking of course. :-)
tsuh yang chen, nyc, USA
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/orchidspecies
--part1_35.131df692.27fd7bde_boundary--