[RML] What is it?
Chris Drew (drews at webgate.net)
Mon, 10 Mar 97 06:07:54 PST
Chris B. wrote..>>
>Roy is incorrect in his assessment of this fish. It is not M.
>lakamora. It is the M. pierrucciae. M. lakamora, from the pictures
>has very obvious red stripes that band the main lateral line. This
>fish does not. The others are supposed to be released later in the
>year.
>
>Gary Lange
>----------
Ahh, but this fish does have a red stripe above and below the main
lateral
line, hence my reasoning for first assuming that it could be a tri of
some
kind. I don't know that they could be called obvious stripes though.
Being that they were fish that I was trying to get a good look at, they
refused to come into good light. Figures....<<
Can anyone in NA clarify whether or not M. lakamora (looks like
Goyder) AND M.pierucciae (looks somewhat like goldiei) are BOTH
available? There seems to be some confusion. I had only heard
about M.pierucciae's availability.
If they are both out there, then who's releasing them? Does Ekk-Will
carry both?
As I mentioned in an earlier post, pictures of both were published in
the IRG publication. The photos are good enough to make a
comparison. Perhaps Chris B. could arrange with Harro to get a copy
of the magazine and let us know what he is seeing in the stores.
Chris
drews at webgate.net