De nada. That's what we're here for!
>but your convention and Roy's visit (is it such a mess?:->>)
>seems to take you so much time that nobody except Chris
>answered on my question who would want to get involved
>into a Species Maintenance Project. I can't remember who
>was it but he was right, we have to know which species is
>endangered (not only in nature but also in aquariums) before
>we can start such a program. But additionally and in a parallel
>way we can also try to estimate if there are any people who would
>try to conserve species for five or ten years or even longer.
>So anybody who would like to get involved into a SMP project
>should at least post a note. If only two people do so, it's nothing
>for us now. However, before you answer to the question above
>please make yourself sure that it will cost you money and
>time to become involved into such a SMP project.
I'd like to know more about it, Harro. Can you expand on your earlier
posting? I felt when you first posted your proposal that it sounded good but
it may be a little too regimented for *some* people.
Regards, Andrew Boyd
><> <>< ><> Andrew Boyd - andrew at pcug.org.au - Frex at FurryMUCK!
<>< <>< : http://www.pcug.org.au/~andrew
><> <>< "Only dead fish swim with the stream!"
<>< : ><> Rainbowfish Mailing List: http://www.pcug.org.au/~andrew/rml.htm
: <>< Sthn. Hemisphere Killifish List: http://www.killi.net/aunzza/