RE: [RML] Fluidized bed vs. Wet/dry

John C. Whitson (menneke at ilinks.net)
Mon, 26 May 1997 18:29:07 -0400

>I've never used fluid bed filters but have been told that they clog and are
>a problem to clean. Also are very tricky to get them to function properly.
>My tickle filters have never clogged - the secret is providing a pre-filter
>that is cleaned regularly. They also offer a skimming effect on the water
>surface if set-up properly. They also offer a wide choice of filtering
>materials...plastic, sintered glass, crushed coral, limestone gravel for pH
>balance etc., etc. If I could afford it, I would put trickle filters on all
>my tanks except the smallest ones.
>
>Adrian.
>
> ........................................
> Adrian R. Tappin
> Home of the Rainbowfish
> http://www.ecn.net.au/~atappin/home.htm
> ........................................

I have used fluidized filters for a couple of years now so I thought I would throw my 2 cents in. I have never had a problem with the fluidized beds clogging, but all my fluidized beds have been of my own construction, and all have used a mechanical pref

ilter. They are really rather easy and inexpensive to build, and have done a great job of biological filtration for me. The only problem I have noticed with them (and this problem leads me to believe that they are very efficient at biological filtration

), is that the water exiting the bed can be oxygen deprived and needs to be reoxygenized (is this a word?). If space or noise is a concern, I would highly recommend a fluidized bed, otherwise, a wet dry will do a great job and will not need any extra reo

xygenation.

Attachment Converted: c:\neudora\attach\RE [RML] Fluidized bed vs. Wet