Roy Hunter wrote:
> You wont ever need to worry about NA Adrian, as fas as I am concerned we are
> just an extension of National and I am the mail room boy :-)
>
> Roy Hunter
> Co-Chairman
> ANGFA of North America
> visit the ANGFA website at:
> http://www.angfa.org
> reach me at:
> roy at angfa.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian R. Tappin <atappin at ecn.net.au>
> To: rainbowfish at pcug.org.au <rainbowfish at pcug.org.au>
> Date: Thursday, February 12, 1998 5:08 PM
> Subject: [RML] ANGFA National
>
> >At 16:36 8/02/98 +1100, Alan wrote:
> >>BTW Adrian, exactly what is the National concept you refer to (see below),
> >>neither Andrew Boyd, or I can work this out...... :) I know 'cos I just
> >>asked him.....<g>
> >
> >Well, I'm a supporter of one ANGFA not 5 or 6, or whatever way it will end
> up.
> >
> >I don't know how many groups are now incorporated but essentially once they
> >are they will be totally independent Associations just like ANGFA (Qld).
> The
> >Qld group might as well be called the Queensland Native Fish Association
> >just like SANFA in South Australia because that's what it is - a totally
> >separate organisation ~ there is no regional group in Qld. As the other
> >groups incorporate what you will eventually end up with will be 5 or more
> >different Associations and not one as was envisaged in the very beginning,
> >vis "National Concept".
> >
> >However, I am also a realist and realise that this trend isn't going to
> >revert back so it would probably be best if ALL the regional groups become
> >independent and incorporated then the remaining financial members of ANGFA
> >National can determine its future.
> >
> >Adrian.
> > ...............................................................
> > Adrian R. Tappin
> > "Home of the Rainbowfish"
> > http://www.ecn.net.au/~atappin/home.htm
> > ...............................................................