Hey, it's probably good that he got reelected :-) People are going to see a lot of stuff messed up now. Those that somehow thought the "other side" couldn't defend them against the terrors of the middle east are now going to realize how foolish that notion was compare to the things that George can do to them. All the boomers better get used to saying "welcome to Wallmart" cause that's what we'll be doing in a few years after we've been pushed out of our job, but still not able to afford retirement. It's a shame though as he'll most likely be appointing a judge on the supreme court. Hey, but we have democracy in IraQ, right???
Julie Zeppieri <bowluvr at hotmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, Harro, you are right. He is also doing a fair job in decimating social
programs hereabouts.
FWIW, I appologise to all you out there in the rest of the world for the
stupidity of my fellow countrymen in re-electing that jerk. :-( I sure
didn't vote for him! Not my country's proudest or smartest moment.
Julie <><
>From: harro.hieronimus at t-online.de
>Reply-To: r_m_l at yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: AW: [RML] Reading stuff - and food for thought
>Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 02:34:04 +0100
>
>Haven’t you read the latest news? George Bush will blow up defense funds
>– and he will save the money in environment and social programs. Call me
>pessimistic but as long as the energy and oil industry rules the US (and
>how should that change the next decades?) nothing will change. Even the
>Chinese seem to have more sense for the problems than GWB.
>
>
>
>Regards Harro
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Andrew Boyd [andrew_db at bigpond.com]
>Gesendet: Montag, 7. Februar 2005 19:24
>An: r_m_l at yahoogroups.com
>Betreff: Re: [RML] Reading stuff - and food for thought
>
>
>
>Hi Christophe,
>
>interesting article. The sad part is that there are a lot of countries
>that don't recognise climate change as a problem at the highest level.
>
>I consider it to be on-topic.
>
>Best regards, Andrew
>
>Christophe Mailliet wrote:
>
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >Just found this very disturbing article on the website of The
>Independent, one of the UK's biggest newspapers, concerning the current
>state of affairs with our planet's climate and what it entails for its
>ecosystems (and mankind):
>http://news.independent.co.uk/world/environment/story.jsp?story=608209
> >
> >I am usually not sending this type of information around randomly, as I
>think everyone should be old enough to educate themselves on this type
>of issues.
> >
> >But I am just thinking that if things happen like described in this
>article (and it looks like it's the case), then there will not be many
>fish (or other animals, for that matter) to keep in aquaria in a couple
>of year's time..
> >
> >Apologies if you feel this is off-topic - I really think it is not that
>much.
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Christophe
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>_________________________________________
>Andrew Boyd
>Business Development Manager
>Daily Basis P/L
>Phone 02 6282 9797 or 02 4885 1357
>Mobile 0412 641 074
>Email andrew at dailybasis.com.au
>or andrew_db at bigpond.com
>_________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> _____
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
--0-479286291-1107888522=:36083
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Yeah, Harro, you are right. He is also doing a fair job in decimating social
programs hereabouts.
FWIW, I appologise to all you out there in the rest of the world for the
stupidity of my fellow countrymen in re-electing that jerk. :-( I sure
didn't vote for him! Not my country's proudest or smartest moment.
Julie <><
>From: harro.hieronimus at t-online.de
>Reply-To: r_m_l at yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: AW: [RML] Reading stuff - and food for thought
>Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 02:34:04 +0100
>
>Haven’t you read the latest news? George Bush will blow up defense funds
>– and he will save the money in environment and social programs. Call me
>pessimistic but as long as the energy and oil industry rules the US (and
>how should that change the next decades?) nothing will change. Even the
>Chinese seem to have more sense for the problems than GWB.
>
>
>
>Regards Harro
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Ursprngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Andrew Boyd Reading stuff - and food for thought
>
>
>
>Hi Christophe,
>
>interesting article. The sad part is that there are a lot of countries
>that don't recognise climate change as a problem at the highest level.
>
>I consider it to be on-topic.
>
>Best regards, Andrew
>
>Christophe Mailliet wrote:
>
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >Just found this very disturbing article on the website of The
>Independent, one of the UK's biggest newspapers, concerning the current
>state of affairs with our planet's climate and what it entails for its
>ecosystems (and mankind):
>http://news.independent.co.uk/world/environment/story.jsp?story=608209
> >
> >I am usually not sending this type of information around randomly, as I
>think everyone should be old enough to educate themselves on this type
>of issues.
> >
> >But I am just thinking that if things happen like described in this
>article (and it looks like it's the case), then there will not be many
>fish (or other animals, for that matter) to keep in aquaria in a couple
>of year's time..
> >
> >Apologies if you feel this is off-topic - I really think it is not that
>much.
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Christophe
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>_________________________________________
>Andrew Boyd
>Business Development Manager
>Daily
--0-479286291-1107888522=:36083--