>snip,snip
>Some fish got their new names - which may cause problems.
>The M. spec. on p. 74 shows M. kamaka. No problem, the species
>has been described officially meanwhile. However, three of the
>fish on p. 75 have names now - and there is no officially
>published description as far as I know. They should have been
>published in the "Revue francaise d'Aquariologie", but I
>haven't seen them yet.
The above species were described in Revue fr. Aquariol.,23 (1996),1-2. 30
June 1996.
Adrian.
ps. you're slipping Harro ;-)
........................................
Adrian R. Tappin
atappin at ecn.net.au
http://www.ecn.net.au/~atappin/home.htm
........................................