Much diatribe deleted
>I will stop here and let people think about this. I must say that i did
>not like writing this and I am sure that I have won few friends with the
>attitudes expressed here. However I think that the direction that is
>being taken is the wrong one and that opinion should be expressed. I must
>admit that I have praecox, I have sort of felt guilty at having them for
>a long while now. However this new action I think is overboard, rash and
>ill disciplined if true.
Whilst Peter must be commended for his thoughts I personally believe that
things will continue as is!
I always look forward to new species arriving at any time, this is purely a
selfish attitude though.
ANGFA must continue to make representations to bodies such as AQIS to allow
the import of these wonderful and seemingly harmless species (rainbowfishes
in particular) and yes we do have a number of undescribed species here -
why is nobody working on their description ? is it lack of funding or
interest ?
BTW Peter you can bring your praecox round to me any time for safekeeping... :-)
Cheers
Alan
|__________________________________\|/_________________________________|
Alan Ford aford at pcug.org.au Canberra, Australia
Homepage: http://www.pcug.org.au/~aford
ANGFA ACT Homepage: http://www.pcug.org.au/~aford/angfa.htm