Re: [RML] SPAM test

MICHAEL SERPA (mserpa at bayweb.net)
Thu, 12 Feb 1998 16:59:56 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: caryho at ix.netcom.com: "Re: [RML] first Blue-eyes and gudgeons/breeding in natural set-ups"
Previous message: Graeme Finsen: "RE: [RML] test SPAM"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew Boyd: "[RML] SPAM test"
Next in thread: Rhonda Wilson: "Re: [RML] SPAM test"

andrew.boyd at dfat.gov.au wrote:
>
> The trick I find, Graeme, is to never let caffeine levels fall below
> the accepted critical minimum ;)
>
> There was something wierd happening to the list yesterday, messages
> were being delayed a bit, but they still came through with no loss of
> traffic - while there are some bounces I think that the PCUG/AUUG
> volunteers do a pretty good job of running a reliable ISP.
>
> Regards, Andrew
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
> Subject: RE: [RML] SPAM test
> Author: MIME:gfinsen at brs.schneider.com.au at INTERNET-MAIL
> Date: 2/13/98 10:16 AM
>
> second response - please ignore.
>
> OK, OK it's Friday morning and I haven't had my first cup of coffee yet
> :-0
>
> > ----------
> > From: Andrew Boyd[SMTP:andrew at pcug.org.au]
> > Reply To: rainbowfish at pcug.org.au
> > Sent: Thursday, 12 February 1998 2:08
> > To: rainbowfish at pcug.org.au
> > Subject: [RML] SPAM test
> >
> >
> > second test - please ignore
> >
>
>
It was probably just El Nino

Next message: caryho at ix.netcom.com: "Re: [RML] first Blue-eyes and gudgeons/breeding in natural set-ups"
Previous message: Graeme Finsen: "RE: [RML] test SPAM"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew Boyd: "[RML] SPAM test"
Next in thread: Rhonda Wilson: "Re: [RML] SPAM test"