Re: [RML] Re: (SPAM) Constitution (

Bruce Hansen (bhansen at ozemail.com.au)
Sun, 8 Feb 1998 09:09:57 +1000

Like I said before - it does not seem possible to have a reasonable
discussion on "the Constitution" without normally placid people getting
quite stirred up ;-)

Of course those that get stirred easily are even more excited .Despite the
importance some place on the constitution, in this instance (and I'm not
sure the RML is the best place to debate it) , no matter how poor an
example it is of the constitution writer's art, it is fulfilling its legal
purpose under the Incorporation legislation.

We will work on it as we are able and according to the feedback we get in
writing from the membership. If someone is really serious about something,
not just whingeing for the fun of it, then they will write. Ask any
politician how he values unsolicited letters on any subject from his
constituents.

Regards,
Bruce.

Bruce Hansen, ANGFA, caring for our aquatic ecosystems.

Please visit us at http://www.ozemail.com.au/~fisher/angfa.htm

----------
> From: Merlin <merlin at orac.net.au>
> To: rainbowfish at pcug.org.au
> Subject: Re: [RML] Re: (SPAM) Constitution (could be broken promises) :)
> Date: Wednesday, 4 February 1998 19:22
>